<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wichita Waits On The KC-X</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/</link>
	<description>A Defense Procurement News Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boeing Confirms Use Of Wichita Facility If KC-X Won</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Boeing Confirms Use Of Wichita Facility If KC-X Won</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=45#comment-51</guid>
		<description>[...] bid for the KC-X proposal the 767 aircraft would have been modified to become the new tanker there. In October the company would no longer make that commitment to using the Wichita plant. The company had discussed using a lower cost plant to do the work with an eye to lowering their [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bid for the KC-X proposal the 767 aircraft would have been modified to become the new tanker there. In October the company would no longer make that commitment to using the Wichita plant. The company had discussed using a lower cost plant to do the work with an eye to lowering their [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

