<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Release &#8212; Statement on US Refueling Tanker Program Announcement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kc-xtankernews.com/2010/03/09/press-release-statement-on-us-refueling-tanker-program-announcement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2010/03/09/press-release-statement-on-us-refueling-tanker-program-announcement/</link>
	<description>A Defense Procurement News Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2010/03/09/press-release-statement-on-us-refueling-tanker-program-announcement/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 16:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=286#comment-169</guid>
		<description>Pretty obvious the program is wired to Boeing. Why would a company bid an RFP that push key performance criteria associated with Boeings approach?

No need to waste the money, now the pressure is on Boeing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty obvious the program is wired to Boeing. Why would a company bid an RFP that push key performance criteria associated with Boeings approach?</p>
<p>No need to waste the money, now the pressure is on Boeing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

