<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for KC-X Tanker News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kc-xtankernews.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com</link>
	<description>A Defense Procurement News Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:46:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reports that KC-46 Contract Already Showing Cost Growth by KC-46A Costs Reportedly Increase</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/06/25/reports-that-kc-46-contract-already-showing-costr-growth/comment-page-1/#comment-13846</link>
		<dc:creator>KC-46A Costs Reportedly Increase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=626#comment-13846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] A few weeks ago it was reported that Boeing (BA) had already informed the U.S. Air Force of at least a $300 million increase in the costs of the first phase of the KC-46A aerial tanker program. This led to Reuters asking the Air Force some follow up questions on the situation. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A few weeks ago it was reported that Boeing (BA) had already informed the U.S. Air Force of at least a $300 million increase in the costs of the first phase of the KC-46A aerial tanker program. This led to Reuters asking the Air Force some follow up questions on the situation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And the Winner is Boeing! by business</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/24/and-the-winner-is-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-9989</link>
		<dc:creator>business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 11:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=590#comment-9989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[defense business through acquisitions..Boeing and EADS unlike other large defense contractors do have the commercial aviation market to help temper ups-and-downs in military spending. Certainly they now have the necessary funds to do even a rather large one although something like buying Northrop Grummans NOC shipbuilding group would seem a little too large and ambitious.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>defense business through acquisitions..Boeing and EADS unlike other large defense contractors do have the commercial aviation market to help temper ups-and-downs in military spending. Certainly they now have the necessary funds to do even a rather large one although something like buying Northrop Grummans NOC shipbuilding group would seem a little too large and ambitious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on EADS NA Will Not Protest by Jet City Joe</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/03/04/eads-na-will-not-protest/comment-page-1/#comment-6837</link>
		<dc:creator>Jet City Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=609#comment-6837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not true taxpayer! The right company was awarded the contract for all the right reasons. The KC-46A will be be on time and on budget. Take that to the bank!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not true taxpayer! The right company was awarded the contract for all the right reasons. The KC-46A will be be on time and on budget. Take that to the bank!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And the Winner is Boeing! by Lockheed Workers Agree to New Contract Will Aid in Lowering Costs for Company &#124; Defense Procurement News</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/24/and-the-winner-is-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>Lockheed Workers Agree to New Contract Will Aid in Lowering Costs for Company &#124; Defense Procurement News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=590#comment-6432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (EADS:P) was going to offer with their tanker program was a non-unionized workforce in Alabama that should have been a lower cost then Boeing&#8217;s unionized one in Washington state. Boeing though was able to get their costs in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (EADS:P) was going to offer with their tanker program was a non-unionized workforce in Alabama that should have been a lower cost then Boeing&#8217;s unionized one in Washington state. Boeing though was able to get their costs in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Air Force Adjusts KC-X RFP To Reflect Start Date In November by Dagpotter</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2010/05/03/air-force-adjusts-kc-x-rfp-to-reflect-start-date-in-november/comment-page-1/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagpotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2011 01:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=396#comment-6107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sir,

The RFP may be found at this link:  

https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&amp;mode=form&amp;id=d6a6105de8722a69e0b1bffdaeda007c&amp;tab=core&amp;_cview=1

Boeing has yet to reveal all the performance details of the KC-46A yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir,</p>
<p>The RFP may be found at this link:  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&#038;mode=form&#038;id=d6a6105de8722a69e0b1bffdaeda007c&#038;tab=core&#038;_cview=1" rel="nofollow">https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&#038;mode=form&#038;id=d6a6105de8722a69e0b1bffdaeda007c&#038;tab=core&#038;_cview=1</a></p>
<p>Boeing has yet to reveal all the performance details of the KC-46A yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Air Force Adjusts KC-X RFP To Reflect Start Date In November by James Harris</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2010/05/03/air-force-adjusts-kc-x-rfp-to-reflect-start-date-in-november/comment-page-1/#comment-6105</link>
		<dc:creator>James Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 19:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=396#comment-6105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the RFP available on line for review?

Since the company has been selected I would like to know in detail the rquirements. 

Jim Harris, USAF Ret
KC-135 Boomer/Loadmaster]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the RFP available on line for review?</p>
<p>Since the company has been selected I would like to know in detail the rquirements. </p>
<p>Jim Harris, USAF Ret<br />
KC-135 Boomer/Loadmaster</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will EADS Protest? by Lorry Libeu</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/27/will-eads-protest/comment-page-1/#comment-6094</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorry Libeu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 17:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=600#comment-6094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A KC-30A was refueling a Portuguese F-16 when the refueling boom detached. This incident is now under investigation and the Spanish Government has pulled the Tanker&#039;s Military Certificate. So much for a proven system that has neve been in operation service. 

Listening to the DoD explain that Boeing was a clear winner, I realized the acquire team finally had a dose of reality in the decision process. Today&#039;s economy coupled with an administration that wants to cut DoD spending, the EADS bigger offer of a Multi-role Tanker Transport is not worth the extra billions of fuel and infrastructure costs. The USAF has over 1000 cargo transports and does not need the cargo lift capabilities of the EADS offer. Most KC-135 missions rarely carry a full load of fuel. It makes good economic sense to buy the Boeing KC-46A which will shave billions of dollars over the next 40 years and make follow on contracts more feasible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A KC-30A was refueling a Portuguese F-16 when the refueling boom detached. This incident is now under investigation and the Spanish Government has pulled the Tanker&#8217;s Military Certificate. So much for a proven system that has neve been in operation service. </p>
<p>Listening to the DoD explain that Boeing was a clear winner, I realized the acquire team finally had a dose of reality in the decision process. Today&#8217;s economy coupled with an administration that wants to cut DoD spending, the EADS bigger offer of a Multi-role Tanker Transport is not worth the extra billions of fuel and infrastructure costs. The USAF has over 1000 cargo transports and does not need the cargo lift capabilities of the EADS offer. Most KC-135 missions rarely carry a full load of fuel. It makes good economic sense to buy the Boeing KC-46A which will shave billions of dollars over the next 40 years and make follow on contracts more feasible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Will EADS Protest? by Jim Faris</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/27/will-eads-protest/comment-page-1/#comment-6081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Faris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 19:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=600#comment-6081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[High risk concept airplane? What are these EADS people smoking? Did any of these spokesmen ever attend high school? Let alone college? For your information EADS, the Boeing 767 airframe has been around for over two decades. how does the A-330 compare? Also, 767 tankers are already flying. how different will the new USAF version be? Finally 60 years of refuel tanker experience has got to be worth something. How many years does EADS have? You want to talk about high risk? Lokk in the mirror. The fact that the KC-135 has served the U.S. military for over 50 years speaks volumes about Boeing&#039;s ability to deliver. EADS better work on truth before anything else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High risk concept airplane? What are these EADS people smoking? Did any of these spokesmen ever attend high school? Let alone college? For your information EADS, the Boeing 767 airframe has been around for over two decades. how does the A-330 compare? Also, 767 tankers are already flying. how different will the new USAF version be? Finally 60 years of refuel tanker experience has got to be worth something. How many years does EADS have? You want to talk about high risk? Lokk in the mirror. The fact that the KC-135 has served the U.S. military for over 50 years speaks volumes about Boeing&#8217;s ability to deliver. EADS better work on truth before anything else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And the Winner is Boeing! by Will EADS Protest?</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/24/and-the-winner-is-boeing/comment-page-1/#comment-6059</link>
		<dc:creator>Will EADS Protest?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=590#comment-6059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] that the U.S. Air Force and Defense Department have awarded the KC-X new aerial tanker contract to Boeing (BA) for their KC-46A aircraft the major question is [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that the U.S. Air Force and Defense Department have awarded the KC-X new aerial tanker contract to Boeing (BA) for their KC-46A aircraft the major question is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Both Companies Submit Final Proposals But Will Continuing Resolution Allow Award? by Air Force Plans Award Before April 1st</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2011/02/11/both-companies-submit-final-proposals-but-will-continuing-resolution-allow-award/comment-page-1/#comment-5940</link>
		<dc:creator>Air Force Plans Award Before April 1st</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=574#comment-5940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the current issues with defense funding the Defense Department and Air Force reportedly said that they hope to award the KC-X aerial tanker [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the current issues with defense funding the Defense Department and Air Force reportedly said that they hope to award the KC-X aerial tanker [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
