<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>KC-X Tanker News &#187; wichita ks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kc-xtankernews.com/tag/wichita-ks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com</link>
	<description>A Defense Procurement News Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boeing Confirms Use Of Wichita Facility If KC-X Won</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/11/18/boeing-confirms-use-of-wichita-facility-if-kc-x-won/</link>
		<comments>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/11/18/boeing-confirms-use-of-wichita-facility-if-kc-x-won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 10:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dagpotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-CX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congressmen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political supporters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wichita ks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wichita plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing&#8217;s (BA) Wichita, KS plant has supported may of their military programs over the years. In their last bid for the KC-X proposal the 767 aircraft would have been modified to become the new tanker there. In October the company would no longer make that commitment to using the Wichita plant. The company had discussed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Boeing&#8217;s</strong> (BA) <strong>Wichita</strong>, KS plant has supported may of their military programs over the years.  In their last bid for the KC-X proposal the 767 aircraft would have been modified to become the new tanker there.  <a href="http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/">In October the company would no longer make that commitment to using the Wichita plant</a>.  The company had discussed using a lower cost plant to do the work with an eye to lowering their overall cost.  This obviously was a blow to the employees and the political supporters of the work being done there.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.kansas.com/news/top/story/1058721.html">Now Boeing announced yesterday that at least some of the military conversion of the aircraft will be carried out in Wichita</a>.  This will gain them even further support from some key Senators and Congressmen as well as there unions.  In many ways the company had no real choice.  The Wichita plant has long been established, can do the work and needs it.  The announcement makes sense at this time.n</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/11/18/boeing-confirms-use-of-wichita-facility-if-kc-x-won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wichita Waits On The KC-X</title>
		<link>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/</link>
		<comments>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dagpotter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Air Force]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[K-CX News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conversions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proposals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wichita ks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wichita plant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kc-xtankernews.com/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boeing has maintained a facility at Wichita, KS for years. In their last proposal for the KC-X Boeing planned on using this plant to do the military conversions of the aircraft as it has for so many others in the past. Unfortunately with the new proposal Boeing no longer makes that guarantee. They are trying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Boeing</strong> has maintained a facility at <strong>Wichita</strong>, KS for years.  In their last proposal for the KC-X Boeing planned on using this plant to do the military conversions of the aircraft as it has for so many others in the past.  <a href="http://www.kansas.com/business/poll/story/974083.html">Unfortunately with the new proposal Boeing no longer makes that guarantee</a>.  They are trying to minimize their total cost and that may require the use of another site then Wichita.  Unfortunately this will be bad for the Wichita plant as it has been looking for work to keep it open in the future.</p>
<p>As the proposals come in things like this will be interesting to look out for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://kc-xtankernews.com/2009/10/14/wichita-waits-on-the-kc-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

